Rejected
Suggested additions to our Toolset
I would like to request that ElevenLabs and MidJourney be added to the list of LLMs available to us as Magai subscribers. I would like a top-notch text to speech, as well as the great visual tools like MidJourney,
Louis Summers 7 months ago
Rejected
Suggested additions to our Toolset
I would like to request that ElevenLabs and MidJourney be added to the list of LLMs available to us as Magai subscribers. I would like a top-notch text to speech, as well as the great visual tools like MidJourney,
Louis Summers 7 months ago
Rejected
Full text of the response after received
The way that the text of a response ends at the bottom of the window is tedious for long responses. I tend to get very lengthy answers to things I work on, and I have to scroll and wait as the response slowly gets displayed; and scroll and wait, ad infinitum … I would like an option/setting to get the response all at once. Just as an example, for the prompt I just sent I had to wait for the response and then scroll down 16 times.
Madsen Pink 7 months ago
Rejected
Full text of the response after received
The way that the text of a response ends at the bottom of the window is tedious for long responses. I tend to get very lengthy answers to things I work on, and I have to scroll and wait as the response slowly gets displayed; and scroll and wait, ad infinitum … I would like an option/setting to get the response all at once. Just as an example, for the prompt I just sent I had to wait for the response and then scroll down 16 times.
Madsen Pink 7 months ago
Rejected
Auto is o
Subject: Feedback – Auto Engine Selection Caused Incorrect Output Hello, I explicitly defined interaction protocols designed to prioritize factual accuracy and process adherence. In one instance, the Auto engine suggested a non-existent ThinkScript function (plotarrow()), directly violating the defined protocol. It also failed to prompt for clarification or validate platform-specific syntax as required. So is the protocol applied in all AI engine use cases? What is the point in writing one if not. This eroded trust and utility of the ability to write a protocol and have it used. It also doesn’t seem possible to tell which AI engine was used when using the Auto feature. I wanted to see which engine had straight out made up ficticuos functions to avoid using them again. Since I could not, it degrades the usefulness of the Auto feature. I am questioning the use case for MAGAI.CO the Auto feature and cross engine customization/protocols was the attraction. Both failed. Please consider: Show which AI engine responded (retroactively, if possible) and why it was chosen. Ensure that custom user instructions are strictly enforced by the AI agent, if this isn’t technically possible then state so because of the engine choice. Add an option for AI responses to cite documentation. 4. Consider allowing users to blacklist engines for never being considered/used via Auto. Consider a feature automatic blacklistings of ones that won’t respect customizations/protocols. Matt
Matthew Newton 7 months ago
Rejected
Auto is o
Subject: Feedback – Auto Engine Selection Caused Incorrect Output Hello, I explicitly defined interaction protocols designed to prioritize factual accuracy and process adherence. In one instance, the Auto engine suggested a non-existent ThinkScript function (plotarrow()), directly violating the defined protocol. It also failed to prompt for clarification or validate platform-specific syntax as required. So is the protocol applied in all AI engine use cases? What is the point in writing one if not. This eroded trust and utility of the ability to write a protocol and have it used. It also doesn’t seem possible to tell which AI engine was used when using the Auto feature. I wanted to see which engine had straight out made up ficticuos functions to avoid using them again. Since I could not, it degrades the usefulness of the Auto feature. I am questioning the use case for MAGAI.CO the Auto feature and cross engine customization/protocols was the attraction. Both failed. Please consider: Show which AI engine responded (retroactively, if possible) and why it was chosen. Ensure that custom user instructions are strictly enforced by the AI agent, if this isn’t technically possible then state so because of the engine choice. Add an option for AI responses to cite documentation. 4. Consider allowing users to blacklist engines for never being considered/used via Auto. Consider a feature automatic blacklistings of ones that won’t respect customizations/protocols. Matt
Matthew Newton 7 months ago
The Acadamy!
Dotto is great of course but the tutorials need to be on Magai.Co broken down into different sections that are easily navigated. Starting with ‘How To Navigate The Tutorials’ We all know people are basically lazy so this needs to be a ‘walk through navigation’ designed for 12 year olds or people will just switch off. I use the Dotto tutorials which are great but they’re fiddly to find with no structure just a list of numbers. Numbers of members/customers will grow exponentially for Magai and so will 1 Star reviews by people who just don’t ‘get it!’ I would restrict access to things until the member has watched the tutorial - have it so they can’t fast forward to the end of the video - they have to watch it - then a button appears for them to be able to use that part - for example ‘Workspaces’ are greyed out until the ‘How To Use Workspaces’ tutorial is watched. Same for all the sections, like Personas and so on. Too many 1 Star reviews is not good - it needs to be nipped in the bud. I would make this a priority as people don’t know how to what we have right now so new stuff is just making this problem worse.
Trevor Angel 7 months ago
The Acadamy!
Dotto is great of course but the tutorials need to be on Magai.Co broken down into different sections that are easily navigated. Starting with ‘How To Navigate The Tutorials’ We all know people are basically lazy so this needs to be a ‘walk through navigation’ designed for 12 year olds or people will just switch off. I use the Dotto tutorials which are great but they’re fiddly to find with no structure just a list of numbers. Numbers of members/customers will grow exponentially for Magai and so will 1 Star reviews by people who just don’t ‘get it!’ I would restrict access to things until the member has watched the tutorial - have it so they can’t fast forward to the end of the video - they have to watch it - then a button appears for them to be able to use that part - for example ‘Workspaces’ are greyed out until the ‘How To Use Workspaces’ tutorial is watched. Same for all the sections, like Personas and so on. Too many 1 Star reviews is not good - it needs to be nipped in the bud. I would make this a priority as people don’t know how to what we have right now so new stuff is just making this problem worse.
Trevor Angel 7 months ago
Completed
Google imagen 4 Ultra Integration
That’s the latest update to Google's Imagen 4 Series Please integrate that as well it has got better prompt adherence and lot of quality improvements as well
Softreviewed.com 7 months ago
Completed
Google imagen 4 Ultra Integration
That’s the latest update to Google's Imagen 4 Series Please integrate that as well it has got better prompt adherence and lot of quality improvements as well
Softreviewed.com 7 months ago
Rejected
Feature Request: API Access for Magai Services
First of all, thank you for the amazing tools and services you provide! I have a feature request — it would be really helpful if you could add API access to your platform. This would allow users like me to connect and use your services programmatically in our own workflows and automation tools (like Make.com, Zapier, etc.). An API would make it easier to integrate Magai into custom apps, automate repetitive tasks, and improve productivity for power users. Looking forward to seeing this in a future update!
Softreviewed.com 7 months ago
Rejected
Feature Request: API Access for Magai Services
First of all, thank you for the amazing tools and services you provide! I have a feature request — it would be really helpful if you could add API access to your platform. This would allow users like me to connect and use your services programmatically in our own workflows and automation tools (like Make.com, Zapier, etc.). An API would make it easier to integrate Magai into custom apps, automate repetitive tasks, and improve productivity for power users. Looking forward to seeing this in a future update!
Softreviewed.com 7 months ago
In Progress
Integration of seadream and seeddance
Seems like these models are cheap and are on par with the top tier models live veo 3
Softreviewed.com 8 months ago
In Progress
Integration of seadream and seeddance
Seems like these models are cheap and are on par with the top tier models live veo 3
Softreviewed.com 8 months ago
Completed
team invites via link
Allows team admins to create a sharable link that they can send to anyone and have them join their team.
Dustin W. Stout 8 months ago
Completed
team invites via link
Allows team admins to create a sharable link that they can send to anyone and have them join their team.
Dustin W. Stout 8 months ago
Ability to create images simultaneously from different models
It would be helpful if I could select the aspect ratio, the AI models, and the number of images. Then, by pressing enter, the request would be sent to the selected AI models. I could then see all the final results together to pick the best one. This would save a lot of time, and I could also see how different models perform with the given prompt.
Softreviewed.com 8 months ago
Ability to create images simultaneously from different models
It would be helpful if I could select the aspect ratio, the AI models, and the number of images. Then, by pressing enter, the request would be sent to the selected AI models. I could then see all the final results together to pick the best one. This would save a lot of time, and I could also see how different models perform with the given prompt.
Softreviewed.com 8 months ago